Friday, March 20, 2026
  • HOME PAGE
  • Electoral Bulletins
    • 2023
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2014
    • 2013
  • MAP
  • Documents
  • Contacts
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME PAGE
  • Electoral Bulletins
    • 2023
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2014
    • 2013
  • MAP
  • Documents
  • Contacts
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result

Protest and secrecy

October 29, 2019
in Uncategorized

The official national count was yesterday (Saturday 26 October) and this was the only session open to observers and party mandatários (agents). It was not actually a count, and simply consisted of showing the slides which would be shown to the public today. The slides and totals had been agreed at a closed meeting Friday.

The opening of the meeting yesterday began with an intervention by six party mandatários, led by Venancio Mondlane of Renamo, saying that under the law agents and observers must be admitted to the count. The mandatários argued that there had been widespread misconduct which affected them and was not being discussed at the Saturday meeting because it had already been voted on in the closed Friday meeting. They said they should have been able to attend the Friday meeting, where it appears the count actually took place.

They also argued that they had only been notified of the Saturday meeting by telephone, when the law was changed earlier this year to require a written notification. The CNE imposed rigid restrictions on parties for submitting candidates, but was lax in obeying the law when notifying parties or handing out state money to parties, they said. The mandatários also objected to being handed a half metre high stack of documents when the arrived Saturday, which could not be read and digested in time for the official count.

After nearly eight hours of mostly closed debate, the CNE simply rejected the formal protest – adding that the fact that the mandatários were there showed that telephoning was adequate, even if illegal.

The meetings showed the very narrow interpretation of the word “count” (“apuramento”). Observers and mandatários were excluded from most of the discussion of the protest on the grounds that the protest is not part of the count, and therefore internal and not open. Similarly it said that the Friday meeting was just to “correct errors” in the data, approve documents and slides to be presented, and not actually a count. So the only “count” was looking at the slides at 11 pm last night.

Thus there is no public record of changes that the various elections commission made to the results. Were polling stations with more than 100% turnout deleted, and if so, which ones. What other “corrections” were made in the secret part of the meetings?

Previous Post

CNE declares huge Frelimo victory and rejects opposition protests

Next Post

Polling station head convicted of ballot box stuffing for Frelimo

Related Posts

Uncategorized

Election-bulletin-74-12May23

May 14, 2023
Uncategorized

Election-bulletin-75-14May23

May 14, 2023
Next Post

Polling station head convicted of ballot box stuffing for Frelimo

This newsletter is published by CIP and has been reporting elections and the democratisation process since 1992.

Detailed newsletters are being published more than 100 times during the registration, campaign and counting of votes, based on reports from our team of 450 correspondents across the country

Editor: Lázaro Mabunda
Director: Edson Cortez
Advisor: Joseph Hanlon
Communication Officer: Liliana Mangove

Published by:
Public Integrity Centre, Maputo
(O Centro de Integridade Pública, CIP)

Election bulletins are available by email. Sign here:

© Copyright © 2026 CIP - Eleições. Todos os direitos reservados

No Result
View All Result
  • HOME PAGE
  • Electoral Bulletins
    • 2023
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2014
    • 2013
  • MAP
  • Documents
  • Contacts

© Copyright © 2026 CIP - Eleições. Todos os direitos reservados